版主
俱乐部理事
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de4bd/de4bdffb0c90685940d8e141573c024721ba389e" alt="Rank: 10"
- 积分
- 3765
- 注册时间
- 2001-11-21
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2ede8/2ede89836db23d0cfc76b8e170559183a395e722" alt="优秀版主奖" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c95e8/c95e8fdb37e96dee7c05b34e9c2e8c260bac7086" alt="耳机鉴赏奖" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/975cb/975cb794b613330867b55a9cbc63e30b57b626d8" alt="社区建设奖"
|
发表于 2012-9-20 17:31:30
|
显示全部楼层
我查到以下这段文字,可以验证楼主的说法。
According to Mark Kluge, the problem of the names of the Vienna orchestra that recorded with Horenstein on Vox is simpler than we sometimes thought. The Vienna Symphony Orchestra signed a contract with Philips in April of 1952; after that, it was still free to record with other labels, but not under its own name. The name Vienna State Philharmonia was used for a short period by Vox to disguise Vienna Symphony recordings, but that resulted in a suit by the Vienna Philharmonic (objecting that the closeness of the pseudonym to their own name resulted in unfair competition). Vox thenceforward used the name Vienna Pro Musica for its Vienna Symphony recordings. Vox did not like paying for a lot of rehearsal time, however, so some of the recorded performances are a bit scrappy, nothwithstanding the excellence of the band. |
|