以前拿过1台黑色的，八仟元。:)
很久了吧！这个价现在肯定拿不到吧 这个转盘出来的声音端正健康。和philips 500r的转盘比起来两头延伸差不多， 但密度低了些， 动态小了些。 乐器的线条感不错， 由于密度的关系， 实体感没有飞利浦转盘那般强烈。 另外感觉整个声场比较靠后。转盘不错， 需要密度大点味道浓点的解码器伺候:lol
ps.可能用aes/ebu输出会好很多:lol 原帖由 bruceshen 于 2008-11-3 14:52 发表 http://bbs.headphoneclub.com/images/common/back.gif
这个转盘出来的声音端正健康。和philips 500r的转盘比起来两头延伸差不多， 但密度低了些， 动态小了些。 乐器的线条感不错， 由于密度的关系， 实体感没有飞利浦转盘那般强烈。 另外感觉整个声场比较靠后。转盘不错 ...
BRUCE比过了就忍不住要写啦,呵呵. 我觉得TL-2X特点就是这样的,比较细腻内敛,声音略靠后. 你的飞利浦LHH500做转盘比它音色浓郁,结像靠前,特别是中下频段. TL-2X讲究的则是干净清爽,而不是浓郁饱满. 特别是低频的线条感,LHH500偶尔觉得浓郁但趋臃肿,TL-2X就无臃肿或偏肥的时候.
昨天比的时候,没用AES,另外配的是鸡线,LHH500配的则是P100电源. 我觉得TL-2X搞好了电源供应,当能更好.
[ 本帖最后由 小白 于 2008-11-3 15:40 编辑 ] http://bbs.headphoneclub.com/attachments/forumid_4/20081020_78c2132fc29fb3aea4b1K539aeZt2134.jpghttp://bbs.headphoneclub.com/attachments/forumid_4/20081103_f64e64f91550a96aea36M9noqBkH8dap.jpg
惨不忍睹啊!上面是刚到那的样子,现在:'(,白板多留意可疑分子,帮我抓出真凶
[ 本帖最后由 hsy36 于 2008-11-7 18:56 编辑 ] 原帖由 bruceshen 于 2008-11-3 14:52 发表 http://www.headphoneclub.com/bbs/images/common/back.gif
这个转盘出来的声音端正健康。和philips 500r的转盘比起来两头延伸差不多， 但密度低了些， 动态小了些。 乐器的线条感不错， 由于密度的关系， 实体感没有飞利浦转盘那般强烈。 另外感觉整个声场比较靠后。转盘不错 ...
想不通，转盘能影响动态:Q 声音的密度，细节，动态都是转盘决定的。
有些东西如果在源头上就丢了的话，后面怎么补都补补回来。:L :L 原帖由 激光鼠 于 2008-11-7 22:04 发表 http://bbs.headphoneclub.com/images/common/back.gif
想不通，转盘能影响动态:Q
影响很大, 非常同意8492的观点. 原帖由 激光鼠 于 2008-11-7 22:04 发表 http://www.headphoneclub.com/bbs/images/common/back.gif
想不通，转盘能影响动态:Q
说明你好的分体系统还没耍过 查了一下,CEC TL-0和TL-1转盘上过STEREOPHILE杂志的A级榜,TL-2则是B级榜.
STEREOPHILE杂志对TL-1转盘的评价挺有意思的,摘录于此:
My first listen to the TL 1 was with it driving the No.30 processor via ST-type optical interface. Because I was familiar with the No.31 transport, the TL 1's presentation took me by surprise. These were two very different-sounding transports, but the TL 1 appeared to have some very special qualities of its own. Extended auditioning confirmed these first impressions. Indeed, I came to like the TL 1 the more I listened to it.
First, the TL 1 had an extraordinarily smooth and analog-like presentation. To call the TL 1 laid-back is an understatement. The music was gentle, sweet, and presented with a more distant perspective than I'm used to hearing. There was a feeling of ease, relaxation, and warmth uncharacteristic of digital. Even compared to the very refined No.31, the TL 1 had a softer, less incisive presentation. The TL 1's overall character can be summed up as unforced and easygoing.
总结起来就是: 声音较远距,文雅,内敛,轻松,不用力.
结论部分可以特别一读:
Conclusion
The C.E.C. TL 1 is unquestionably a remarkable transport. Its smoothness, ease, and liquidity set a new standard in digital playback. Midrange textures in particular are rendered with a lushness that I find immensely involving. There is no trace of glare or grain, something I greatly value. In these areas, the
TL 1 surpasses the performance of even the Mark Levinson No.31 transport.
On the debit side, the TL 1's bass is slower and not as well defined as those of the reference No.31 or Proceed PDT 3. The C.E.C. is less dynamic, taut, and powerful in relation to these two other excellent transports, the result being less rhythmic involvement in the music. Finally, the TL 1 doesn't quite match the No.31 or (to a lesser extent) the Proceed PDT 3 in transparency and resolution of detail.How much one likes the TL 1's presentation will be highly dependent on musical taste and the characteristics of the rest of the playback system. Some listeners will be unable to live without the TL 1's analog-like ease; others will prefer a transport with more dynamic contrast and better bass definition. If the No.31 and PDT 3 are like excellent solid-state power amplifiers, the TL 1 is the digital equivalent of a classic tube design—more forgiving of source imperfections, sweet at the expense of some resolution, and a little fat in the bass. A careful audition, preferably in your own system, is mandatory before buying.
I must reiterate my praise for the TL 1's superb build, stunning cosmetics, and beautiful operation. The top-loading mechanism, heavy clamp, and sliding glass door provide a tactile dimension to CD playback.
All things considered, I can enthusiastically recommend the C.E.C. TL 1. It is not only an eminently musical transport, but also a gorgeous—and innovative—piece of audio electronics. 不知配WADIA64.4如何？ 自己用西裝 TL51X + DX71 MK2音質已非常優秀 (而且要記得封口,音質差異非常大:P )
不知和TL-2配搭會是怎樣的聲音:D DX71 MK2多少价位
回复 89# 的帖子
http://www.panolux.com/dx71 mk2香港代理售價不錯
跟機superlink駁cdt 有2千元級別以上同軸線質素
未run in的音質已優於da10,stagedac,照估計和da11,wadia dac2不相上下
