版主
俱乐部理事
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de4bd/de4bdffb0c90685940d8e141573c024721ba389e" alt="Rank: 10"
- 积分
- 3765
- 注册时间
- 2001-11-21
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2ede8/2ede89836db23d0cfc76b8e170559183a395e722" alt="优秀版主奖" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c95e8/c95e8fdb37e96dee7c05b34e9c2e8c260bac7086" alt="耳机鉴赏奖" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/975cb/975cb794b613330867b55a9cbc63e30b57b626d8" alt="社区建设奖"
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da6f2/da6f216c60923803db95fe44daa51ccb9a062cd4" alt=""
楼主 |
发表于 2008-11-8 21:20:14
|
显示全部楼层
查了一下,CEC TL-0和TL-1转盘上过STEREOPHILE杂志的A级榜,TL-2则是B级榜.
STEREOPHILE杂志对TL-1转盘的评价挺有意思的,摘录于此:
My first listen to the TL 1 was with it driving the No.30 processor via ST-type optical interface. Because I was familiar with the No.31 transport, the TL 1's presentation took me by surprise. These were two very different-sounding transports, but the TL 1 appeared to have some very special qualities of its own. Extended auditioning confirmed these first impressions. Indeed, I came to like the TL 1 the more I listened to it.
First, the TL 1 had an extraordinarily smooth and analog-like presentation. To call the TL 1 laid-back is an understatement. The music was gentle, sweet, and presented with a more distant perspective than I'm used to hearing. There was a feeling of ease, relaxation, and warmth uncharacteristic of digital. Even compared to the very refined No.31, the TL 1 had a softer, less incisive presentation. The TL 1's overall character can be summed up as unforced and easygoing.
总结起来就是: 声音较远距,文雅,内敛,轻松,不用力.
结论部分可以特别一读:
Conclusion
The C.E.C. TL 1 is unquestionably a remarkable transport. Its smoothness, ease, and liquidity set a new standard in digital playback. Midrange textures in particular are rendered with a lushness that I find immensely involving. There is no trace of glare or grain, something I greatly value. In these areas, the
TL 1 surpasses the performance of even the Mark Levinson No.31 transport.
On the debit side, the TL 1's bass is slower and not as well defined as those of the reference No.31 or Proceed PDT 3. The C.E.C. is less dynamic, taut, and powerful in relation to these two other excellent transports, the result being less rhythmic involvement in the music. Finally, the TL 1 doesn't quite match the No.31 or (to a lesser extent) the Proceed PDT 3 in transparency and resolution of detail. How much one likes the TL 1's presentation will be highly dependent on musical taste and the characteristics of the rest of the playback system. Some listeners will be unable to live without the TL 1's analog-like ease; others will prefer a transport with more dynamic contrast and better bass definition. If the No.31 and PDT 3 are like excellent solid-state power amplifiers, the TL 1 is the digital equivalent of a classic tube design—more forgiving of source imperfections, sweet at the expense of some resolution, and a little fat in the bass. A careful audition, preferably in your own system, is mandatory before buying.
I must reiterate my praise for the TL 1's superb build, stunning cosmetics, and beautiful operation. The top-loading mechanism, heavy clamp, and sliding glass door provide a tactile dimension to CD playback.
All things considered, I can enthusiastically recommend the C.E.C. TL 1. It is not only an eminently musical transport, but also a gorgeous—and innovative—piece of audio electronics. |
|