What Hi-Fi对歌德PS1000耳机的评论

小白

交易区新帖推荐

原文见：http://www.whathifi.com/review/grado-ps1000







For  优点Pwerful; effortlessly dynamic; the midrange detail is superb; beautifully built  有力、轻松表现音乐动态、超好的中频细节、制造品质好

Against   缺点Everyone else will be listening with you    边上的人和你一起听


It says everything about the way these headphones perform that we would gladly put up with any mickey taking that their undoubtedly pre-war looks might bring. 虽然有人喜欢拿歌德耳机的“战前式样”来取笑，但它的声音表现足以使我们愉快地忍受类似的取笑。

That's not to say this is a flawless package. The 'phones weigh in at a beefy 500g rather than the more typical 300g of most rivals – so you're always aware of their presence.  不是说这是一个完美无缺的产品。注意它的重量达到了500克，而它的多数对手为300克。所以戴着它的时候，它的“存在感”是很强的。

Unlike previous Grado range toppers, which used mahogany ear-pieces, the PS1000s combine a mahogany inner core with an alloy outer-casing.  PS1000和之前歌德的顶级型号不同，它把红木内芯和合金外壳结合在了一起。

The combination of materials self-damps to give the revised drive unit a solid, low-resonance base to work from. A new high-purity copper cable completes the engineering content. 这种复合材质的运用给予耳机单元一个结实而低谐振的“底盘”。耳机线采用新的高纯度铜制造。

Not perfect, but still wonderful   并非完美但依然美妙

If you're expecting perfect sound, you're in for a disappointment. There are certain things headphones just can't do. They can't lay out a soundstage in front of a listener in the way half decent speakers can.  假如你期待着听到完美的声音，那么，可能并非如你所愿。有一些地方是耳机无法做好的。它们无法在听者面前展开一个犹如优质喇叭系统一般的声场。

Neither do they offer even a sniff of the physical impact of music.  耳机也无法表现出音乐能给予身体的冲击力，在这方面一点都无能为力。

However, get past these innate shortcomings, and it takes no time to realise Grado has moved the headphone game on.  然而，除了这些耳机的天生缺点之外，我们马上能意识到，PS1000把耳机听音推向一个新的境地。

Yes, the price is staggeringly high. But when you hear the way the PS1000s destroy all other high-end cans we've heard for insight, dynamics and timing, it's easy to argue they're worth every penny. 确实，价格非常高昂。但当你听到PS1000耳机在表现力、动态和节奏感方面把其他高档耳机“摧垮”之后，不难察觉这副耳机其实是物有所值的。

There are, of course, certain things that have to be in place. A top class source is mandatory: think of Cyrus's CD8 SE as a minimum standard.  当然有些条件是必须满足的。首先必须有一台顶级的音源。Cyrus CD8SE（1200英镑）是一个起码的要求。

You'll need a capable headphone amp, too. We used Beyerdynamic's A1 (£990).  还需要一台够格的耳机放大器。我们使用了拜亚动力A1。

Spellbinding transparency 迷人的透明度

Once up and running, the Grados' transparency is spellbinding. They reveal the differences between recordings with almost contemptuous ease, thanks to a sublime ability to resolve the tiniest details and organise it all into a cohesive and seamless whole. 歌德耳机的透明度是具有蛊惑性的。凭借着高超的细节解析力，以及把所有细节融合为一个有机整体的能力，它能轻而易举地揭示出录音之间的差异。

Listen to Holst's Mars and the PS1000s' strong dynamics come to the fore. There's a wonderful fluidity to the way crescendos build, and no shortage of punch when required. 聆听霍斯特的“火星”，PS1000强大的动态幅度夺人眼目。音乐中的渐强能流畅地积聚起来，音乐所需的力度丝毫不缺。

The tonal balance is nicely judged: high-frequency performance lacks nothing for bite, yet is composed enough to stay in line even when provoked by poor recordings.
And the bass impresses for the power, authority and finesse on offer. The multi-layered bassline from Michael Jackson's Billie Jean is tracked with determination without detracting from the rest of the polished production. 声音的平衡性是深思熟虑的：高频表现丝毫不缺光芒，然而同时又是控制良好的，即使是糟糕的录音也不会过分。低频的力度、权威感和速度感给人印象深刻。迈克尔·杰克逊的歌曲Billie Jean中层次丰富的低频成分被PS1000表现得恰如其分，同时不会干扰这个完成度很高的录音的其他部分。

These headphones sound confident no matter how complex the recording, yet still they communicate all the fun and energy inherent in the music. 无论录音多么复杂，这副耳机都能充满信心地表现音乐，并且把音乐中的乐趣和能量完好地传达给听者。

It's extremely rare to find a product that's so revealing, yet so musical with it. To get a similar level of performance from speakers would cost 10 times as much. 能这样同时具有高揭示力和音乐感的耳机是极其稀少的。如果是喇叭系统，要达到类似的表现水平，代价要10倍于此。

Almost makes the PS1000s seem like great value, doesn't it?  这么看来，PS1000耳机似乎还是个性价比很高的产品了？



以上只代表What Hi-Fi的观点，翻译供参考。

[ 本帖最后由 小白 于 2012-5-24 18:17 编辑 ]

anythrk

Lion_Heart

沙发

Lion_Heart

靠，居然被抢沙发，而且还是你！

cgliuhit

留名再看

小白

背景大家知道一下，What Hi-Fi杂志一直是很青睐Grado耳机的。大多数歌德耳机都获得了五颗星的评价。而森海HD800它只给了四颗星。拜亚动力T1也是五颗星。

xuzone

进来看下:D

雨落清晨

whathifi是近几年来权威媒体里堕落的最快的，以前给ipod dock颁奖，现在居然给国产一个叫森美的耳塞颁奖

bearGo

“耳机也无法表现出音乐能给予身体的冲击力，在这方面一点都无能为力”……

what hifi为什么不说一些更实质性的具体缺点呢
客观才能让人信服嘛

小白

下面是另一本英国音响杂志Hi-Fi Choice对PS1000耳机的评论。是我以前翻译的。



For (优点)
> Tonally neutral to an extent most headphones and speakers only dream of, with detail to die for and effortless dynamics: revealing and involving in equal, large, measure (音色中性的程度,为大多数耳机和喇叭所YY. 细节之丰富令人抓狂,具有轻松的动态表现力. 同时具备高揭示力和高吸引力这两大要素,而且程度相当,不偏不倚.)

Against (缺点)
> The combination of weight and rather hard headband can make long-term wearer comfort a serious issue (耳机本身的重量和较硬的头带使得长时间的佩带舒适度成为一个问题.)

Sound quality (音质)

As well as playing familiar CDs through these headphones, we were lucky to be able to give them some serious use at a recording session, where it was possible to compare live sound with reproduced (recorded using a superb Royer stereo ribbon microphone, carefully positioned) with only a few seconds between the two.
(除了用PS1000耳机欣赏熟悉的CD碟之外,我们也幸运地得到了一个难得的机会,在正式的录音场合中使用它. 这样我们就可以有机会将现场的真声和重播出来的声音进行间隔仅几秒钟的切换比较. 录音工作以一只位置精心摆放的Royer立体声丝带话筒进行.)

This kind of comparison may not be the most demanding in terms of detail, but will show up tonal imbalance like anything.  (这样子的比较,也许从细节解析方面说还不算要求最高的,但是,它会直接地揭示出音色的平衡度.)

What impressed us with the PS1000 was that the tone of the instruments (piano, violin and cello) was clearly very accurate right from the first note, which means that the headphone's contribution was unusually small.
(PS1000耳机给我们留下深刻印象的地方是,小提琴,钢琴和小提琴的音色非常之准确,从开始的第一个音起就是如此. 这也意味着耳机本身的个性非常之小.)

Having frequently used the GS1000 (original) in such a situation, we're in no doubt that the PS1000 beats it on grounds of neutrality. The GS is already very good, but the PS really steps up a gear. At the same time, it seems to transcend an obvious limitation of headphones in the bass – they can't make you feel low notes the way loudspeakers can.
(我们经常把GS1000耳机用在这样的场合中. 我们毫无疑问地觉得,PS1000的声音比GS1000更为中性. GS1000在这点上已做得很好,但PS1000确实更进了一步. 同时,这副耳机也超越了耳机在低频方面的局限性. 它们发出的低频能使人"感觉到",类似于喇叭低频的效果.)

In a few cases, though, they can make one believe that one has felt something. We found this with the Sennheiser HD800, as well as the GS1000 and the PS1000 might just be the best yet in this department.
(在一些地方,这副耳机能使人觉得"感觉到了声音". 这样的效果,HD800,GS1000耳机也有,但PS1000这方面的效果也许是最好的.)

Human perception can be tricked in all sorts of ways and evidently if the frequency balance is good, the bass extension just right and the distortion low, the ears and brain will between them create the illusion of real bass impact. The bottom few notes on a concert grand piano can be pretty visceral and that's what we heard – experienced – via the PS1000.
(人类的感知可以受到欺骗,假如频率平衡得好,低频延伸做得好,失真度足够低,人的耳朵和大脑之间会产生出一种真实低频的假象. 大三角钢琴的最低音域的音能使人的身体感觉到,我们从PS1000耳机中体验到了这种感觉.)

Returning to the world of familiar CDs, we were more than a little impressed with the amount of detail that was being brought out, even from recordings of no remarkable sonic merit. In this respect, we would place this headphone as roughly an equal to the HD800, which on the other hand we rated better than the GS1000.
(回到重放熟悉的CD碟,我们对于PS1000的细节再现能力印象非常之深,即使是录音质量并不出色的CD碟. 在这方面,我们大致把它摆在与HD800同等的水平上. HD800我们给它的整体评价是高于GS1000的.)

Such rankings aside, however, we are in general terms talking about the sort of detail that the best loudspeakers on the planet will only give if fed by the finest ancillaries in a carefully optimised set-up – in other words, the kind of thing you just don't hear every day.
(撇开这种座次问题不谈,我们说的意思是,这是地球上最好的喇叭在搭配最好的周边器材时能给出的细节表现水平. 这样的水平是难得一听的.)

Even in areas where headphones tend to play second fiddle to speakers, notably imaging, the PS1000 manages a more than passable performance.
As for dynamics, they wonderfully combine the shock factor of sudden changes in level, which makes for excitingly rhythmic music-making, with the subtle, maybe almost imperceptible, swell of a gradual crescendo, which grows from quiet to deafening without the slightest sense of effort, but with spine-tingling final effect.
(即使是在那些耳机天生弱于喇叭的领域,比如空间结像,PS1000的表现也完全可以接受. 至于动态能力,PS1000奇妙地结合了猝发的动态变化带来的"刺激音效",以及微妙得几乎难以感知的渐强音造成的效果,这种渐强能从宁静自然而轻松地逐渐增长为振聋发聩的地步,效果能使人的神经震颤.)

<img title="英国Hi-Fi Choice杂志对歌德PS1000耳机的评价" border="0" alt="" src="http://mos.futurenet.com/techradar/Review%20images/Hi-Fi%20Choice/HFC%20329/HFC329.grado.ps1000-420-90.jpg" real_src="http://mos.futurenet.com/techradar/Review%20images/Hi-Fi%20Choice/HFC%20329/HFC329.grado.ps1000-420-90.jpg">

In any type of music, at any level, this is music reproduction of the highest order which convinces both instinctively and analytically. Hats off to Grado!
(以任何音量播放任何音乐,这都是最高级别的音乐重播,不论是感性上还是理性上都令人信服. 让我们向GRADO脱帽致敬!)

M_Furtwangler

音质的第三段应该是小提琴，钢琴和大提琴吧

headfan

PS500更适合我

neolikuying

PSK党要来看看的