snova 发表于 2018-6-20 13:02
单端输出谐波失真要低一大截，但依然属于不好的范畴。狗血的是测试表现，确实不排除人家声音好，对不？
不 ...
意大利品牌的质量总是难与德国匹敌
放弃数字滤波的nos，早猜到了。。。下次再放个泉的测试结果，不是说在国外很火的嘛;P。。。totaldac是nos数字滤波，也可以放着看看什么样
系统发生学 发表于 2018-6-20 13:41
放弃数字滤波的nos，早猜到了。。。下次再放个泉的测试结果，不是说在国外很火的嘛。。。totaldac是nos数 ...
该杂志泉的测试结果，上面有人已经贴出来了
数字抖动是不是可以通过界面或转盘解决？用了INT204和HELEN是不是参数就会变得好看了？
单端下好于平衡可以理解，我经常觉得单端的声音并不差，甚至采用RCA输出至耳放，耳放接4芯平衡耳机线。
泉的NOS模式说了，一般NOS的测试会很差，泉的NOS用了特别的技术让测试也很不错。
实际听下来泉的NOS非常有特色。44.1的人声用NOS模式非常好听。
系统发生学 发表于 2018-6-20 13:41
放弃数字滤波的nos，早猜到了。。。下次再放个泉的测试结果，不是说在国外很火的嘛。。。totaldac是nos数 ...
stereophile刚测了泉，解码部分设计很好，没啥毛病
数字抗抖动能力略差点，也还可以。
第一篇：
The unaffected insightfulness of the HoloAudio Spring exposed more of what I imagine was originally aesthetically intended and encoded on my silver discs and invisible files. Consequently, it made me feel that my journey into digital audio may have only just begun.
Highly recommended.
Read more at https://www.stereophile.com/content/holoaudio-spring-kitsun%C3%A9-tuned-edition-level-3-da-processor-page-2#hVFgd4stE4tXsOKO.99
第二篇：
The above points to the only complaint I have about the HoloAudio DAC, though it's less a complaint than a suggestion: Why not make a version of the Spring that dispenses altogether with the oversampling chip, and with the controls required to activate those filters? Maybe such a thing could sell for even less than $2499.
Never mind that. I'm just happy that so relatively affordable a product has proven me wrong in the most agreeable way: The HoloAudio Spring "Kitsune Tuned Edition" Level 3 DAC is a revelation in every sense. As Herb said: Highly recommended.— Art Dudley
Read more at https://www.stereophile.com/content/holoaudio-spring-kitsun%C3%A9-tuned-edition-level-3-da-processor-art-dudley-july-2018#Od10CgQJM6hJbz8S.99
这个评价有些夸张的高啊，都是极力推荐！
门的耳朵 发表于 2018-6-20 15:02
第一篇：
怎么到处都有这个js出现，广告无孔不入，版主能不能管管
stereophile 和 innerfidelity 同源, 看这两个网站的方法也差不多, 看图不看字;P
The measurement result is way more valuable than the reviewer's subjective evaluation.
那个地方出来的东西从来就是不看好。就是所有的东西都可以用样子来形容。不真实。
厂家对此评测的官方回应：“
JA found high distortion values at 50hz / -3dB,at the transformer output (XLR) in his Instrumental measurements and at the moment there is a considerable curiosity / expectations by Audio Enthusiasts.
But about the sound "nuances" due to the transformer output:
6MOONS | Srajan Ebaen wrote:
"XLR/RCA. Whilst the balanced outputs do go the extra distance on transformer windings to be more complex, in my setup I slightly preferred them even though our Esoteric C-03 preamp doesn't use a fully balanced i/o path (single-ended volume control). The transformers added a subtly oily or viscous tone texture which made the RCA feed a tad more dry or matte.... Whilst preferences vary, the RCA and XLR outputs do not sound identical. Experimentation is recommended to see what you fancy more."
http://6moons.com/audioreviews2/aqua2/6.html
HIFI ADVICE | Christiaan Punter wrote:
"Quite possibly. Personally and within the context of my system, I quite like the slightly smoother XLR sound. The Wilsons are plenty lively and articulate themselves and with its balanced outputs, the Formula xHD already sounds more articulate and dynamic than the M1. Ultimately, the beauty of this is that one can simply choose whichever solution sounds best."
http://www.hifi-advice.com/blog/review/digital-reviews/spdif-dac-reviews/aqua-formula-xhd-dac/
In our opinion, the -3dB at 50Hz is correct as laboratory signal, but corresponds to an extremely high reproduction level of low frequencies, a condition very difficult to find in the normal musical content. Also, it is almost sure that at these levels the distortion produced by the woofer at 50hz will be much higher than the one due to the transformers of Formula.
Given that Formula xHD is a true modular DAC, we have in development a new revision of XLR board with a new output transformer: our goal will be to combine sound quality, "nuances" and instrumental measurements.
I contacted John Atkinson and he will make a new "follow up" review of the updated Formula with new transformers for XLR output.“
貌似主编说的是毫不犹豫推荐试听(auditioned)，没有直接说购买。评测杂志的人用词都很讲究。
不过最终还是耳朵收货吧。指标其实不用太看重。胆机的指标也都不怎么样。
到此，有些人的心还是凉了50%
