|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da6f2/da6f216c60923803db95fe44daa51ccb9a062cd4" alt=""
楼主 |
发表于 2014-10-31 13:26:58
|
显示全部楼层
Which brings us to another myth:
关于黑胶的“暖” “丰富” warmth, richness 原因前面已经提到。关于评价动态大于CD,从另一文章关于录音行业的内幕看,更多是由于录制的时候,录音师必须改变动态水平,才能批评黑胶之一录音界面,压缩动态,提高音量级。所以听感上“温暖,质感,动态” 或者鲜活。 某种程度上胆机也会产生一种完全不同于晶体管功放的声音,胆机也有大量粉丝。(抛开是否喜欢,原理是该文的重点。)
Since the audio on vinyl can't be compressed to such extremes [as CDs], records generally offer a more nuanced sound. 黑胶录制模式决定了无法被制作成CD水准的录制水平。
Huh? The author here is referring to the so-called "loudness war," which refers to the music industry's tendency to highly compress the dynamic range of recordings so that they can be recorded at a louder level. 但是黑胶为何被认为动态更好呢“声响战争” 录音行业里一般要压缩录音的动态,以使黑胶可以录制到一个更响的水平。(声音更响,而不是动态水平更高。)
The fact that many in the recording industry are engaging in this silly and detrimental practice is really beside the point. There's no getting away from the fact that CDs offer - by far - the better recording medium for wide-dynamic-range recordings compared to vinyl by virtue of the former's inherently wider dynamic range capability. 这里重点不是录音行业这种愚蠢的残缺的方式, 而是CD作为录音媒介可以提供更好的动态水平。 |
|