|
|
发表于 2017-11-1 10:50:33
|
显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 Phase 于 2017-11-1 10:56 编辑
比方说，蓝字就是我十分不同意的。完全可以给出一个物理的描述。
https://www.inner-magazines.com/ ... sical-reproduction/
I don’t know about you, but what I want out of an audio system is a music playback system – not just a system that reproduces sounds (although that is of course part of it) but also one that reproduces a musical performance.
As a result, when I think about what it is that makes an audio system good, I begin by asking what it is that makes a musical performance good. A good music playback system has to be one that is capable of reproducing the qualities of a good musical performance.
If we ask why it is that we love music as much as we do, the answer has to be that music moves us – it causes us to experience strong emotions and to have certain thoughts, often of a kind that could not have been had in any other way. Moreover, it makes sense to us that music should move us – our being moved by music isn’t just an effect that we note, in the same way that we might note the psychological effects of alcohol or drugs.
As I see it, the only explanation that there is for how it could be appropriate for us to be moved by music – by mere sound, divorced from any language – is that mere sound is capable of expressing things, whether this be states of mind, like emotions, or extra-mental things, like the mountains in Strauss’s Alpine Symphony. And a good performance is a performance that unlocks that meaning, that lets the music speak or sing what it has to say. (You can always tell the difference between a good performance and a bad one by asking yourself, while listening: is anything getting communicated here, or is this just an awesome array of sound, or the exercise of a phenomenal technique?)
Well, in just the same way as there can be a great virtuoso pianist who is not a good communicator of musical meaning, so there can be an enormously expensive audio system, with incredible specs, that is incapable of conveying the musical meaning that a recording has successfully captured. We have all heard such systems.
And just as it is hard to say what it is about the playing of the phenomenally gifted pianist that accounts for his failure to communicate meaning, so, too, it is with audio systems: we recognize the failing when we hear it, but it is impossible to give a specification of the physical properties on which such failure supervenes. As every audiophile knows by experience, there is no algorithm for picking out a good music playback system.
When I want to know whether I will enjoy listening to a given system, I pick a few recordings that I know have captured the expressive power of a performance and I listen to see if the music playback system lets me hear that expressive power. These might include an old scratchy but incredibly intimate and humane performance of Schumann’s Kinderszenen by the great pianist Benno Moiseiwitsch; as well as the extremely vivid, detailed modern-day recording of Mahler’s Third Symphony by the Vienna Philharmonic under Pierre Boulez. While it can sometimes be useful to ask the sorts of technical questions that audiophiles ask, in my view the best question that can be put to a music playback system is always this: Is it allowing me to hear the expressive power that I know is contained in this performance?
_________
Paul Boghossian is Silver Professor of Philosophy; Chair of Philosophy from 1994-2004 at New York University. His research interests are in the philosophy of mind, the philosophy of language and in epistemology. Topics he’s been writing about include color, rule-following, eliminativism, naturalism, self-knowledge, a priori knowledge, analytic truth, realism, relativism, the aesthetics of music and the concept of genocide.
His books include Fear of Knowledge: Against Relativism and Constructivism, Oxford University Press, 2006; New Essays on the A Priori, (edited, with Christopher Peacocke), (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000). Content and Justification: Philosophical Essays, Oxford University Press, 2008.
“Relativist and constructivist conceptions of truth and knowledge have become orthodoxy in vast stretches of the academic world in recent times. In his long-awaited first book, Paul Boghossian critically examines such views and exposes their fundamental flaws.” Fear of Knowledge, Oxford University Press 2006
His Hi-Fi system has Meridian 506 as a CD Player; Linn Axis turntable; Benz Micro Ruby 3MC cartridge; Convergent Audio Technology SL1 preamp; Crown Reference amplifier (temporary while listening for a replacement); speakers: DeVore Fidelity Silverbacks.
但是我同意的是，audiophile最终不是物理上的描述，不是靠algorithm（或许有也说不定呢？），而是形成的也是犹如操纵车辆，带上眼镜，的身体的延伸。只不过audiophile是耳朵的延伸，怎么操纵耳朵？你必须得从某种方式知道～这种身体的延伸就是具身性
这是从前写的：http://www.headphoneclub.com/thread-244936-1-1.html
|
|
[复制链接]
